A Rose for Emily and Society in the Eyes of William Faulkner
William Faulkner is really an amazing writer. By writing an extremely narrative about a spinster, he demonstrates how society’s ethical fiber can hinder the progress of a community. In “A Rose for Emily,” the author picks to expose the development of a town by using strong characterization, vibrant settings and plot advancement.
Faulkner’s protagonist, Emily Grierson, is the perfect symbol of how the moral fiber of an individual can stunt development. Brought up believing that she belonged to high society, Miss Emily’s character revealed, through her perspectives, that she is not one to partake in its progress. She did not renovate her home which utilized to be stylish in its own decade and was extremely out of place among the “garages and cotton gins” (Faulkner par. 2) that represented community development.
She refused to put the metal number and mailbox when the postal service was upgraded– likewise a sign that she declined to be a part of the society where she belonged. She also gave china-painting lessons, an art type that had long been thought about a part of history and really conventional.
Faulkner likewise brilliantly shows that aside from being stubborn about accepting modernization, Miss Emily’s refusal to carry on signifies the way individuals can prevent social development with their beliefs or behavior. Her refusal to accept her daddy’s death even after 3 days when the male passed away demonstrates how her character sticks frantically to the past for sanity and stability.
The method she had poisoned Homer Barron is symbolic of how hanging on to the past can be fatal to advance. She understood that her sweetheart was going to leave her and if this takes place, she would not just lose the love she desperately desired but also the pride that she maintained as a “Grierson.” Killing Homer, also substantially a sign of modernization because of his task as a supervisor for a building business killed Emily’s opportunities of turning into a better person.
Although the author chooses to focus the story on Miss Emily’s character, he also shows how other individuals’s mindsets towards each other can subside the pace of development. William Faulkner improves this theme well by using other characters in the story to demonstrate how the moral fiber of the town slows down its development.
Judge Stevens stayed with his gentlemanly methods when next-door neighbors complained about the nasty odor originating from Emily’s house. His reply, “will you implicate a woman to her face of smelling bad?” (Faulkner 24) showed that he would rather keep his ethical beliefs than resolve a crisis in the community. Col. Sartoris, Emily’s factor for not paying taxes, signifies how the past can block any attempt in monetary advancement as well.
The silence of the Negro housemaid Emily count on for several years also strengthens the contention that one’s ethical beliefs can impede the truth from coming out for too long. The Negro is a sign of ethical oppression since of the way that society utilized to treat his race. Since the community would not listen to a black guy, he picked to be quiet and this triggered a fantastic hold-up in the discovery of what was true.
Faulkner’s Storyteller also voices out the various perspectives of individuals about Miss Emily. Thinking that she must not behave in specific methods kept them from recognizing what was truly happening to the woman. By making Emily the center of gossip and numerous misconceptions, the community did not totally establish and did not learn of the truth up until it was far too late.
By utilizing descriptions of lots of other items to contrast development and decay, the author masterfully develops the theme. Aside from your homes, the clothing that the town individuals wore in Miss Emily’s funeral service were thought about conventional despite the reality that they were already residing in the lap of contemporary society. The “yellow-wheeled buggy” (Faulkner 30) on which Emily and Homer drove around the neighborhood likewise represents how she had practically release her morals since of her love for the guy.
The buggy was colored yellow, a strikingly dynamic color compared to the blacks and whites associated in almost every description of Miss Emily. Her reduced hair after her father’s burial also symbolizes that her life had actually been cut by her failure to accept that life needs to move on. The description of how she was found dead with her “head propped on a pillow yellow and moldy with age” (Faulkner par. 54) again repeats that she had let the future escape by clinging on to her memories instead of moving on.
More items and descriptions consisted of in the setting also prove to reinforce Faulkner’s theme about progress. Miss Emily’s depiction as an old fat woman “puffed up like a body long immersed in still water, and of that pallid color,” supports the idea that her character had already died mentally and spiritually because she did not move on with her life.
The “unnoticeable watch ticking” (Faulkner par. 7) represents how time can only delay the revelation of the reality but can not entirely hide it from coming out. The foul odor of Homer’s body being secretly kept also supports the concept that decay can not be kept despite the proud front that Emily was showing the public. The skeleton on the bed that had actually currently stayed with the sheets even more heightens the style that the holding on to the past can be fatal.
Faulkner’s plot development shines through a special style of narration that not just reveals his imagination but also assists support the theme of sluggish progress development. The author uses a distinctive way of telling the story by going back and forth from the past to the present and in between events.
By doing so, Faulkner shows that the previous keeps meddling with today occasions. Instead of letting readers comprehend the story as it develops based upon a streaming timeline, he utilizes previous events and ideas propping up in every part of the story to discuss how Miss Emily’s character decayed with her stubbornness to cling to her yesteryears and beliefs. This style is symbolic of how handing on to memories can subside the pace of understanding the fact and attaining complete advancement.
William Faulkner is a very dazzling writer who optimizes every detail of a narrative to enforce a theme on his audience. The behavior of the strong characters relays his message concretely. The settings of the story provide numerous symbolic items that move the readers to comprehend the plot and theme very well. Above all, his narrative style of retelling a story is extraordinary and merges the style to all the other components of his writing. Miss Emily genuinely should have a rose however William Faulkner merits the applause.