Hit enter after type your search item

A Rose for Emily vs Killings


A Rose for Emily vs Killings

!.?. !? English 2010 March 20, 2013 “A Rose for Emily” vs “Killings” The story “A Rose for Emily” was composed by William Faulkner. The other story I am utilizing to compare and contrast with is “Killings” composed by Andre Dubus. These stories are comparable in plot and theme. Both of these stories handle murder, love and vengeance. Though, love and murder exist in various methods the two stories. The main character in both these stories are of the opposite sex and they are both the protagonist. “A Rose for Emily” is about a ladies called Emily Grierson and her mysterious life as a southern belle.

While “Killings” is based upon a man named Matt Fowler who devotes a bad criminal activity. Faulkner and Dubus begin both short stories “A Rose for Emily” and “Killings” with a funeral opening. “A Rose for Emily” opens with “When Miss Emily Grierson died, our entire town went to her funeral service: the men though a sort of considerate affection for a fallen monolith, the ladies mostly out of curiosity to see the inside of her house, which no one save an old manservant– a combined garden enthusiast and cook– had actually seen in at least 10 years” (Meyer 84).

This begins with Emily’s death then goes backwards to tell about her life story. Dubus starts his story with “On the August early morning when Matt Fowler Buried his youngest son, Frank, who had actually lived for twenty-one years, eight months, a 4 days, Matt’s older son, Steve, turned to him as the family left the tomb and walked between their pals, and stated: “I ought to eliminate him.” (Meyer 97). The story begins with Frank’s funeral then reverses to discuss his death. Both of these stories are told out of chorological order. The first lines of both of these stories speak about theme death.

Considering that the authors being with a funeral moment at the beginning of the story, this is an anticipation of the rest of the story to follow the tone. The setting of both these stories happen in a town. They are different in the way one remains in the south and the other remains in the north. “Killings” occurs around the Massachusetts area and “A Rose for Emily” occurs in Mississippi. Matt is a middle class male who becomes consumed with the requirement to get vengeance on his boy’s death. His child Frank is killed by a guy called Richard.

He is the partner and daddies daddy of the women his child loves. This is what leads Matt into killing someone he desires pay back for his child death. Matt eliminates since he loves. Emily was obsessed with holding on to the past and to avoid modification. When her father dies she is really unfortunate. She then meets a male called Homer Barron. She hesitates she will lose him too because he is not the kind of man to settle. So if she kills him she might a minimum of still be able to see him after he is dead due to the fact that she will keep his dead body in her house.

By her keeping the body in your house it reveals she had a tough time of releasing. Emily eliminates because of her extreme love. The stories are comparable in such a way that both characters Matt and Emily kill due to the fact that of their strong act of love. They kill out of love for someone. Emily killed Homer because she was afraid to be alone. When it comes to Matt, he killed for closure for his child’s death. This makes the reader have compassion with the lead character who show their love by murdering someone. Another similarity in the stories is both of the characters have to do with their life styles and factors for their actions.

Emily and Matt are both looking for vengeance. Matt murders Richard and Emily murders Homer out of vengeance. Both character are strong and do what requires to be done. They are the same since they both murder somebody. Nevertheless, they kill in different ways. Emily goes to the store buys arsenic. “I want some poison,” she stated to the druggist” (Meyer 87). If she poisons him she will keep his dead body in her home. Matt eliminates various in the way of him using a weapon. “Matt went to the bed room for his wallet, put the gloves in one trouser pocket and the. 8 in the other and returned to the living room, his hand in his pocket covering the bulge of the cool cylinder pushed versus his fingers, the butt against his palm.” (Meyer 102) He kills so they will not be able to see him walking the streets. He knows his wife can not deal with seeing Richard every day in the area. “I don’t see him. I’m in the store all the time. Ruth sees him. She sees him too much. She was at Sunnyhurst today getting cigarettes and aspirin. It’s killing her.” (Meyer 96) Willis asked him for how long he had actually been thinking of killing him. “Daily considering that he got out.

I didn’t consider bail. I believed I wouldn’t have to fret about him for many years. She sees him all the time. It makes her cry.” (Meyer 97) Both of the murders were planned. The preparation in the stories appears more significant than the real killing. Emily and Matt both hide what they have actually done. Committing murder to individuals to get vengeance. They both keeps their murders a trick. Emily conceals her murder due to the fact that she stays in her house with the dead body. “Currently we understood that there was one space in that area above the stairs which no one had actually seen in forty years, and which would have to be forced.

They waited until Miss Emily was decently in the ground before they opened it.” (Meyer 89) She lets nobody understand about what she has done till they get in the house years later on and discover Homer’s body. Matt and his partner choose they can not inform their other kids about their father killing Richard. “We can’t inform the other kids, she stated. “It’ll harm them, thinking he got away. However we mustn’t.” (Meyer 108) Both of these stories tells us how enthusiastic love motivates an individual to devote a murder for the sake of love.

These stories show how tales of love are so strong and effective that can result in murder. Despite the fact that murder is incorrect they do it due to the fact that their love is so strong and powerful it leads to murder. Works Cited Meyer, Michael. “A Rose for Emily.” The Compact Bedford Introduction to Literature: Reading, Thinking, Writing. Ninth ed. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2012. 84-90. Print. Meyer, Michael. “Killings.” The Compact Bedford Introduction to Literature: Reading, Thinking, Composing. Ninth ed. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2012. 96-108. Print.

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar