Hit enter after type your search item

Analyzation of Characters in the Crucible

/
/
/
53 Views

Analyzation of Characters in the Crucible

The Crucible True Function One of the elements that can be accredited to starting the hysteria over witchery in the Crucible is the weak point of numerous of the characters in the story. The fear and lack of psychological stability of these characters are a critical reason regarding why these trials occurred. It was Parris’s worry of his credibility being tarnished by his child’ssickness that led him to bring John Hale which eventually spirals down to the whole witch hunting hysteria.

It was Tituba’s fear of being hanged that led her to accuse all those people of being involved with the devil. It was John Proctors unwillingness to get included that caused the downfall of him along with the town. It is our natural impulse as people to prevent anything that will either bring us harm physically or mentally without thinking about other viewpoints of the situation. We ensure decisions without collecting significant aspects; individuals can be blinded by fear in addition to love.

Like fear love is another weak point that is represented by a character in the play. Proctors love for his other half was apparent to the court and was ultimately utilized versus him. Proctor did include himself in the town’s hysteria over witchery, although he held significant proof that might add to ending these trials. It was not until his better half was detained that Proctor started to get more involved in the trials. Pursuing the freedom of his partner Proctor ultimately admits his affair with Abigail misusing away his reputation.

Although love is more of strength then a weak point in this play I see it as a weak point. Human weak point is greatly exposed in the Crucible; it is shown through the acts of the significant characters in the story. Hypocrisy is a common characteristic among many of the characters in the Crucible. Much of the religious leaders are guilty of hypocrisy, such as Reverend Parris. Although Parris has actually considered himself to serving god and to live by his/her guidelines his actions through the play and total disposition can be referred to as both immoral and unethical.

Another circumstances of hypocrisy devoted by a character throughout the play is when Abigail opened herself to Jesus. “. I desire the light of god, I desire the sweet love of Jesus,” in these lines Abigail is declaring that she is rid of the devils power over her and she want to come back to the good beautifies of god (Miller, 189). In reality Abigail’s outcry was in no other way a statement of herself to god however rather a deceiving objection to make the look of innocence in front of the unknowing spectators.

The terrible hero of the story John Proctor also exemplifies hypocrisy. When asked to recite his rule Proctor whether deliberately or forgetfully stops working to point out “thou will not devote infidelity.” Proctor claimed to be male of god despite the fact that his prior sins with Abigail violated this really rule. Hypocrisy is one of the more typical defects of individuals. At one point or another we will all experience a hypocrite, someone who decrees particular worths without following those worths themselves.

In conclusion the Crucible is an elucidation on specific defects of people that are exhibited by personalities in the story. Arthur Miller creates these characters with particular attributes and put them in distinct scenarios to help discuss the natural aberrations of human beings. The crucible amplifies these weak points so it is more obvious to the reader. We are able to determine these flaws and integrate them into the real life. The Crucible is less of a melodrama on spirits, witch hunting, and the devil, and more of a magnification on the natural defects of individuals.

Works Pointed out

Applebee, Arthur N., Andrea B. Bermudez, Sheridan Blau, and Arthur Miller. Language of Literature Course 6 American Literature. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Business, 2005. Print.

“The Crucible.” Shmoop. com. Ed. Shmoop University inc. Shmoop University Inc,, 2009. Web. 30 Nov. 2009.
http://www. shmoop. com/crucible/

“The Crucible.” Sparknotes. com. Ed. Sparknotes. SparkNotes LLc., 2009. Web. 30 Nov. 2009.
http://www. sparknotes. com/lit/crucible/

Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. Evanston: Mcdougal Littel, 2006. Print.

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar