Hit enter after type your search item

Arthur Miller’s “The Crucible” Essay

/
/
/
15 Views

Unjust Justice Systems; A comparison of the West Memphis 3 and The CrucibleImagine sitting at home one night and having police officers show up at your hose and arrest you for a criminal activity you had no concept was committed. 3 teenage boys in West Memphis, Arkansas and over thirty-nine characters in The Crucible went through precisely that. The West memphis 3 is the trial of three teenage young boys who were charged with killing two eight-year-old oys in the woods and leading a hate group.

The trial portrayed in The Crucible are based upon the real life Salem Witch Trials, the accused in the play were charged with witchcraft. Proof in both cases was insufficient and primarily eye witnessed.

Both criminal activities devoted were abstract and referred to as the devils work. All accused in both trials were doomed from the beginning. In The Crucible to save oneself if accused one must confess to something they didnt do and after that name people that did do it, generally if they wished to live thy had to lie and implicate other innocent people.

The West Memphis three had to go through the court system with corrupt people lying and no chance to prove themselves innocent.

Arthur Miller depicted the evidence in The Crucible as just eye witness accounts and petty thinking, such as the ability to fake a faint. The characters that danced in the woods were thought about reputable and what they stated was all that was required to convict the people of witchcraft. In the real life accounts of the West Memphis 3, the evidence used versus the teenagers were black Metallica t-shirts, the confession that didnt match the occurrence, and peers that informed the cops that they overheard one of the teenagers state they were going to eliminate two young boys. The peers story later changed when under oath but the judge reffered back to the very first story to assist convict the accused. In both cases the accusers could not counter argue the proof because it was their word versus the witnesses.

Prior To the West Memphis trials the cops had a confession from all 3 teenage boys. t was used versus them in court. The reason for the confession, some argue, is a condition called Satanic Panic. Somebody who has Satanic Panic produces false memories that place themselves at the scene of the criminal activity they were implicated of. The crime generally is devil related, for instance rape, magic, and voodoo are all known as the work of the devil. People who are diagnosed with Satanic Panic are typically also identified with Multiple Personality Disorder. The witches in The Crucible were charged with harming others with magic. They needed to confess themselves to keep themselves from being hanged. This is an example of how Hellish Panic is explained. When Mary Warren says, Its not a technique! I-I used to faint due to the fact that I-I thought I saw spirits. (miller 47) she is explaining Hysteria, or Hellish Panic; she created the spirits because the other girls saw the.

In The Crucible Hale, a specialist in the location of witchcraft, played a big role in the courtroom. In the trial of the teenagers there was a doctor who was a professional in the location of stanic panic. Being specialists in such locations are tough to prove, the doctor of hellish panic did not have a degree or any proof that he studied such a subject. He merely specified that he has dealt with patients claiming to do things because the devil told them to. In the play Hale just requires individuals to confess to conserve their lives, which is not the work of a doctor however more of a persuader. Both males later examined the case, the implicated, and the proof and wished to conserve the innocent individuals. Hale describes his modification of viewpoint by saying, Let you not mistake your responsibility as I mistook my own. (miller 58) THey likewise were not successful.

Both crimes are abstract, meaning that there is no evidence achievable for a simply conviction, but both criminal activities have major effects. In The Crucible individuals who denied being a witch were sentenced to be hanged. Two of the teenagers were sentenced to be hanged. Two of the teens were sentenced to life in prison and the last was sentenced to death by injection. Is that reasonable? The teens still had a full life in front of them however due to the fact that they were used as scapegoats, it was interrupted. Can you call a justice system that convicts individuals for such crimes just?The 1994 case of the West Memphis three and the 1953 play The Crucible have resemblances.

Abstract convictions, false allegations, and unjustified executions are all part of both trials. Neither account is something to be pleased with, nor need to such times be duplicated. When you take a look at such comparable occures, which are separated by four years, you begin to question if humans actually learn from their errors. Jessie Misskelley, Damien Echols, and Jason Baldwin, the West Memphis 3, are being in prison; they have been there for 5220 days and awaiting their death. Spreading understanding of this hideous case and raising support could assist get them and appeal and save 3 innocent individuals.

You might also have an interest in the following: intolerance in the crucible

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar