StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The role of logic in argumention - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Logic means clear and orderly thought. Logic is necessary to support an argument in any kind of persuasion, in answering an essay question, and in supplying evidence to support an opinion. It works by testing propositions against one another to determine their accuracy. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98% of users find it useful
The role of logic in argumention
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The role of logic in argumention"

Elements of Argument Final Requirements in English Discuss the role of logic in argumention. Include some discussion of deductive and inductive reasoning and fallacies. Logic means clear and orderly thought. Logic is necessary to support an argument in any kind of persuasion, in answering an essay question, and in supplying evidence to support an opinion. . It works by testing propositions against one another to determine their accuracy. When making arguments, it is necessary to determine that the following elements are present: (1) a thesis that declares the writers position on the problem at hand; (2) an acknowledgment of the opposition that nods to, or quibbles with other points of view; (3) a set of clearly defined premises that illustrate the arguments line of reasoning; (4) evidence that validates the arguments premises; and (5) a conclusion that convinces the reader that the argument has been soundly and persuasively made. Only when these elements are clearly structured and followed in the respective order, will this argument be considered logical. One rule of logic is that no conclusion can be drawn unless the major premise states a universal. A second rule of logic is that no conclusion can be drawn if the conclusion does not necessarily follow from the two premises. This can occur of the major and minor premises are both true, but are not related or are not necessarily connected. We have learned that there are two kinds of logical thought: deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning. When one deduces, she moves from a general argument to a specific argument. On the other hand, when one reasons inductively, you observe the specific(s) and move to the general. Being aware of common errors that people make in logical thinking will help you evaluate the soundness of arguments you hear and read, as well as those you write. Some common fallacies include hasty generalizations, stereotype, false analogy, circular reasoning, attacking the person and not the issue, either – or fallacy, non sequitur (it does not follow), among others. 2. Discuss the significance of analysis of an argument. The analysis of an argument is significant as this particular task asks one to read a brief argument, analyze the reasoning behind it, and write a critique of the argument. Analysis of an argument does not ask one to develop your own opinion like the analysis of an issue task. The analysis of an argument task involves analyzing a given opinion, including considering questionable assumptions that underline the opinion, counterexamples that may weaken the conclusion, or evidence that may support it. In analyzing an argument it is important to present a logical flow of ideas, clear control of the English language, and the use of a strong format, with an introduction and a conclusion. Due to the short time limit it is advisable to keep sentences concise and use a few well-developed examples to support one’s view. If one knows the elements needed to make argument analysis, the individual would be able to exhibit one’s ability to write analytically. The most important elements to ensure that arguments are analyzed efficiently are as follows: reading the material carefully, think before you write, focus on critiquing, develop examples fully, separate conclusions from premises, quantify one’s ideas, arrange and review contents of one’s introduction, body and conclusion, and proof read one’s work. 3. Discuss how to make an effective persuasive argument. Make sure to include how good argument needs a refutation and organization. A individual would be able to make an effective persuasive argument by following these steps: (1) develop a stance by clearly explain the argument; include viewpoint(s) you personally advocate; (2) establish credentials through informing the audience of any previous experience(s)/research that pertains to the argued point; (3) anticipate opposing arguments by being aware of opposing viewpoint(s); (4) counter opposing arguments through the utilization of responding to them as introduction to personal viewpoint(s) and (5) use reason by basing persuasive argument on evidence and facts. To enable an individual to make an effective persuasive argument, the traditional parts should be observed to strengthen the argument. These parts are: (1) introduction; (2) narration, or background statement of the facts; (3) partition, or forecast of the topics to be presented; (4) conformation, or the confirmation of the piece. In contemporary English classes, this would be called the body of the text. (5) refutation, or discussion of alternatives; and (6) peroration, or a conclusion. It’s often helpful to tie the conclusion back to the introduction in order to strengthen your claim. These parts are helpful in forming the structure in persuasive writing. 4. Discuss at least 3 elements of critical thinking and rhetoric that learned in this class? What is their significance for you and why? We learned that critical thinking and rhetoric have the following elements: (1) Identification of premises and conclusions.  Critical thinkers break arguments into basic statements and draw logical implications. (2) Clarification of arguments. Critical thinkers locate ambiguity and vagueness in arguments and propositions. (3) Establishment of facts. Critical thinkers determine if the premises are reasonable and identify information that has been omitted or not collected.  They determine if the implications are logical and search for potentially contradictory data. (4) Evaluation of Logic. Critical thinkers determine if the premises support the conclusion. In deductive arguments, the conclusions must be true if the premises are true.  In inductive arguments, the conclusions are likely if the premises are true. (5) Final evaluation. Critical thinkers weigh the evidence and arguments.  Supporting data, logic and evidence increase the weight of an argument.  Contradictions and lack of evidence decrease the weight of an argument.  Critical thinkers do not accept propositions if they think there is more evidence against them or if the argument is unclear, omits significant information, or has false premises or poor logic. These lessons are significant for me because they enabled me to be aware of the elements needed in writing effective arguments. This developed my skill in writing persuasive arguments designed in a logical way. By being aware of the significance of analysis, my analytical abilities were honed and I become more confident in argumentative writing. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The role of logic in argumention Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
The role of logic in argumention Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/creative-writing/1555004-the-role-of-logic-in-argumention
(The Role of Logic in Argumention Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
The Role of Logic in Argumention Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/creative-writing/1555004-the-role-of-logic-in-argumention.
“The Role of Logic in Argumention Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/creative-writing/1555004-the-role-of-logic-in-argumention.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The role of logic in argumention

The Trojan Condoms Company

he use of inductive logic is whereby the advertisement designer provides the readers with several similar examples and allowing then to draw a general conclusion.... Deductive logic on the other hand provides the readers with general propositions and then allowing the readers to draw a conclusion from a specific truth....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle in APA Style

Currently, the fields of mathematics, computer science, and law are more likely considered as branches of logic.... The scope of logic can, therefore, be very large, ranging from core topics such as the study of fallacies and paradoxes to specialized analyses of reasoning such as probability, correct reasoning and arguments involving causality.... There have been many disputes regarding the true nature of logic.... The author states that logic plays a key role in philosophy and Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle referred to logic....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Character Analysis

The character of the narrator in the story is composed of emotion and logic, as it is vivid in the following lines, “There is nothing wrong with inventing words in a business.... hether the first person narrator resembles the author or not, it is evident that he or she plays a significant role as the spokesman of the author....
2 Pages (500 words) Admission/Application Essay

Academic writing and discourse functions

Unlike essays that generally describe the subject matter, argumentative essays allow the writer to adopt a biased approach towards the matter under consideration.... Argumentation reflects the writer's confidence in the text he/she puts in front of the public.... It is very easy for… However, people tend to be very specific, particular and choosy in their approach once they have to take a stand for their words and defend them....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

An Amphiboly Is a Tactic to Deceive

This form of argument is based on a negative logic, where is A is not proven to not exist, then it must mean that A does exists, and vice versa.... However, the argument itself which seems to be logical bears an error in reasoning, therefore, making the argument itself illogical....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

CRTICAL THINKING COURSE REFLECTIONS

For example, more frequent argumentative debates or some kinds of communicative challenges like case studies or even games for communicative skills and logic.... Of course, some principles we learned were familiar to me, I would better say they were obvious, because people use them in communication… But because of the course I understood how to speak logically, argumentative and noticed some of my rhetoric mistakes I've never thought about....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Rhetorical Communication

However, it is interesting how the same significant social and historical events can inspire people to create absolutely different works of… For the president of States Abraham Lincoln that War was his primary concern and a headache during his years I the government while for Emily Dickenson the war was a daily horror film as for most American citizens....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Westfailure System by Susan Strange

Idealism: The Battle Rages On' (2005) discusses the role of power from both realist and idealist perspectives.... In the presented research, it is an analysis of two articles from international relations area.... On the one hand, there is a research titled 'Westfailure system' written by Susan Strange in 1999....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us