The book Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, is based in the future where books are prohibited and not allowed by anyone. The firefighters set fire to the houses instead of putting out fires due to the fact that people were concealing books. Fahrenheit 451 should be prohibited because of the federal government power, the actions of particular characters, and violence. The first factor Fahrenheit 451 must be prohibited is government power. One example is when Captain Beatty states “Any man’s crazy who thinks he can deceive the federal government and us” (Bradbury33).
It’s basically saying that you’re dumb if you believe you can get by with reading which’s not right. A 2nd reason is when Man Montag states “Monday burn Millay, Wednesday Whitday, Friday Faulkner, burn ’em to ashes, then burn the ashes. That’s our motto” (8 ). That’s stating that the firemen are basically going to burn all over that still has books. Those are some reasons that Fahrenheit 451 should be prohibited for its government power. The next reason Fahrenheit 451 ought to be prohibited is the actions of certain characters.
One example of the actions is when Mildred Montag states “Hell!” the operators cigarette proceeded his lips “We get these cases nine or ten a night. Got numerous, starting a couple of years ago, we had the unique machines built” (Bradbury11). This is essentially saying the firemen have actually gotten so lazy that hello developed makers to do the majority of their work for them. Another factor is when Clarisse McClellan states “A lot of individuals are. Afraid of firemen, I indicate. However you’re simply a male, after all …” (7 ).
It’s bad since firefighters have burnt numerous individuals books and houses that individuals have actually become scared of them now. Those are a couple reasons why Fahrenheit 451 must be prohibited for actions of specific characters. The last factor Fahrenheit 451 ought to be prohibited is violence. The very first example of violence is when Person Montag states “We burnt an old woman with her books” (Bradbury49). It’s incorrect due to the fact that they burnt down the old women house without getting her out initially, the least they could have done would have been bring the lady out of the home.
The next example of violence is when Clarisse McClellan states “I’m afraid of children my own age. They kill each other” (30 ). It’s extremely violent for it to be typical to have kids just going around eliminating each other. Those are some reasons that Fahrenheit 451 need to be prohibited for violence. So as you see Fahrenheit 451 should be prohibited for lots of factors, not simply one. As you saw by all the research done on this book and the proof that was provided it must definitely be prohibited.
Some people may believe that this book is a good book and needs to not be banned, however I do not. Will this book be banned or not? Bradbury, Ray. Fahrenheit 451. New York: The Random Home Publishing Group, 1953. Print. “The Long and the Short of It.” Ncac. NCAC Newsletter: Censorship News, 3 Jan 2007. Web. 2 May 2013. “Fahrenheit 451.” Ray Bradbury. David Mogen. Boston: Twayne, 1986. 105-111. Twayne’s United States Authors Series 504. Twayne’s Authorson GVRL. Web. 7 May 2013.