Frankenstein and the Human Mind
The human mind is something researchers have actually been attempting to understand forever. Science can not alter how the mind interacts with one’s body, and even how it works. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein utilizes the development of a phony being to stress the reality that the human mind can not be modified or replicated successfully. Dr. Frankenstein thought he would be able to create and control the mind of an animal. He had attempted many times, but to no obtain. After talking with a professor, he lastly determined a way that he would be able to complete what he had actually been attempting to for several years.
However does Frankenstein pass that natural boundary placed before us by our peers? To create life, a being with its own mind, had never been done before. What are the repercussions of his actions and was it really worth it to exceed those limitations? Mary Shelley says no, it was not worth it. Frankenstein thought he would be able to control this creature, control his feelings and how he would act on them. He would quickly learn that was not the case. Instantly after producing this unnatural being, Frankenstein had to serve as a rather fatherly figure to teach the “beast” how to walk and base on his own.
I do not believe it was what he meant, but by doing this the animal naturally took a look at Frankenstein as being his sole “developer,” or “daddy” if you will. There was nothing he could say or do, and definitely absolutely nothing science might do, to change the thinking of the creature. He, by developing life, had connected himself to this being from the very beginning. When the animal is out in the streets for the first time, the entire town is completely versus him, trying to bring him down, tossing stuff at him, etc. There is nothing science can do to take the anger and sadness out from the animal.
It is only natural to the mind that you will feel such feelings if a whole town is against you. That is simply how the mind works. It reacts to certain scenarios in a particular way, beyond sciences manage. Frankenstein tried to forget about the creature, but it crept right back up into his life with the murder of his little sibling, William. The creature is mad with Frankenstein, upset for what he had actually done to him. Frankenstein made the creature much bigger and more powerful than a typical human, and since of this, it isn’t necessarily easy for Frankenstein to state no to the creatures’ needs or desires.
He demands a female partner, which brings us to another argument advanced by Shelley. When you venture into the unknown by producing life, by developing abnormal beings, you risk the risk of more than one being created. When you pass that limit by clinically explore the human mind and life, just bad things can come from it. It is a loss-loss no matter how you take a look at it, from Shelley’s perspective. In the film, Frankenstein is put forth with a very harmful job. Either producing a second abnormal being with it’s own mind, or informing the animal he has currently made that he can not do that.
Mary Shelley worries that both of these results are bad, which it is impossible to avoid both scenarios. By providing an unnatural being its’ own mind, you are offering it the benefit to believe on its’ own. This is exceptionally unsafe, as you can not manage it after this point. If the being you enlivened is larger or stronger than you, you are at the will of it to do what it asks. Since Frankenstein didn’t give in to the creatures’ desires, the animal was not just accountable for the death of his little brother William, but also the death of the well liked servant, Justine, and eventually the death of his better half, Elizabeth.
Frankenstein then proceeds to pass that limit even further, by duplicating the mind of his wife in the very same way in which he produced the creature. His other half comes “back to life” but with little to no memory. The creature tries to bring her to his side, finally getting what he desired, a partner. However, in a struggle over the belongings of Elizabeth, she shrieks and dedicates suicide, harming Frankenstein a lot more. What he thought would boost science and bring innovation would ultimately be his downfall.
Which is due to the fact that he ventured past that limit by trying to develop or duplicate the human mind, something in which science has no control over. The human mind can not be altered or reproduced successfully in any method, and any efforts to do so will end in a devastating way. I agree with Shelley in this regard, as she proved in her movie. The human mind is something so complex that scientists are still attempting to figure it out totally, not to mention replicate it, or develop it from scratch. Frankenstein was attempting to use some brains from dead people in his attempts at producing life, however it is still all incorrect just the same.
It is immoral and without a doubt beyond that limitation that should not be passed. We saw an extremely clear example of what Shelley believes would occur, and I believe it is safe to say it is fairly precise. You could in theory attempt to pull something off like Frankenstein did, and you may even be able to manage that being, however would it be worth it? Shelley states no, and I agree with her. The cons surpass the pros forever. You would not be able to manage the produced unnatural being, and it would cause havoc over society. The human mind is something not to be meddled with, and “Frankenstein” is a good example of this.
If you create someone or something so distinct, it will naturally wish to be amongst its’ kind. If you wished to experiment, you would need two creatures, not simply one, which could end up being a really hazardous risk. Researchers do not completely comprehend the human mind, and thus can not effectively control it. Mary Shelley’s Film, “Frankenstein,” effectively cautions us of the repercussions of what can come if you pass a certain boundary by meddling with specific things science does not totally comprehend. The human mind is a spiritual, unique device that every human being has. It permits one to think, to feel feeling.
It is really harmful to attempt to duplicate this in the production of an abnormal being. I agree with all the points Shelley is making in her film, in that it needs to not be tried. It is unethical and extremely harmful, and just bad things will originate from it. Life is a natural thing that we are blessed to have, and we ought to not push our luck into trying to create beings in which we can manage, because it can’t be done. The human mind can not be altered or replicated, and therefore, scientists should not attempt to do so, especially not till they have a better understanding of how it works so that they can discover how to manage it. Word Count: 1,197