StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Work Groups and Teams - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
In the essay “Work Group and Teams” the author focuses on team structures, that work together in order to achieve the organizational goals with high effectiveness and efficiency. There have been many techniques devised that can lead to the formation of effective team structures at a workplace…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.1% of users find it useful
Work Groups and Teams
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Work Groups and Teams"

 Work Group and Teams Abstract Work groups and work teams are terms that are used interchangeably these days. In broader aspects, work groups or teams are defined as two or more individuals that work in correlation with each other in order to achieve a common goal. In today’s highly competitive era, the organizations depend highly on their team structures, that work together in order to achieve the organizational goals with high effectiveness and efficiency. There have been many techniques devised that can lead to the formation of effective team structures at a work place. The team structures have been modified over time to meet the challenges of current global environment so that the organizations could perform competitively. It’s not only the design of the work groups or teams that are of importance but once the teams have been properly structured they should be effectively managed so that they could perform with utmost efficiency. Work Group and Teams In 1984 McGrath defined a group as an entity comprising of two or more people. In his perspective the group was deemed to be small to maintain the integrity and dynamics of a group structure while accounting for the independent opinions of the group members. But in his classification a group structure normally included families, small social and friendship groups or work crews. In contest, Turner in 1987 defined a group structure as a unit which has a psychological meaning for the members. In his process of thought, when a member joins a group he drives norms and beliefs from the group itself which as a result effect the member’s attitude and behavior. Turner distinguished an individual’s affiliation to the group as more like a reference than a mere membership. Drawing from these perspectives, eventually, a group or a team, as a whole, is defined as an affiliation of two or more people who interact directly or indirectly in order to achieve a common goal (Earley & Gibson, 2002). Given the complexity of today’s work requirements, interdependence and correlation among employees is an unavoidable aspect of a work environment. In today’s global structure, people work interdependently, interacting with each other to maintain working and social norms at a work place. Groups and teams do not mean the same thing even though both these terms are used interchangeably these days. A group is defined as one or two people who have gathered together and are gaining satisfaction by the collective influences with no special attention to the common goal, whereas team is a structure where people are organized together, so that they could work in correlation with each other to attain that goal. So keeping the work environment in mind, it can be said that a team is a group working towards a common goal (Griffin & Moorhead, 2012). Diversity among the group members with respect to their age, gender, culture, expertise and status within the organization greatly contributes to the performance level achieved through the group. It was believed that a heterogeneous group was far more effective as compared to a homogenous one as it brings diversification and multiple perspectives to the group. For example a group comprising of male and female individuals will have different solutions towards a problem as it is a proven fact that females tend to take a different approach to matters like communication and conflict resolutions as compared to the male members of the groups (Lumsden et al, 2010). But the current heterogeneous population demographics of the United States of America, which has provided many examples of the heterogeneous work teams, have facilitated a deeper analysis of the team structure. Contrary to the previous assumptions which emphasized the positive aspects of such group structures, it has been found that such team structures influence the decision making process in the work environment both in a positive as well as negative manner. Thus it has become crucial to manage the resources in an effective manner so as to ensure that diversity is contributing towards the building of efficient teams (Voutsas, 2011). Though in the present it can be easily seen that just the differentiation between the group origins and composition is not enough, the battle between interdependence and diversity always comes into play in the modern world of connectivity. Old strategies are not so effective any more, thus organizations are motivating groundbreaking ways of thinking and strategizing so that goals could be achieved in a far more effective manner. In the current rapidly changing wok environments and the global economical states, organizations seem more inclined towards ‘hot groups’ rather than individuals or even ordinary teams for the completion of their assigned tasks. A hot group is more likely defined as a state of mind that brings people together around a stimulating challenge, inspiring them to meet that challenge with passion and determination. Hot groups are distinguished as highly democratic with respect to their internal demographics, meaning that they show no concern towards the organizational ranks of the individuals in the group as long as those individuals are deemed capable to add value to the task and their standards of excellence are considered to be meticulous. The main examples of hot groups would be the team structures at organizations like Google and Apple. They facilitate individual thinking and creativity, the team members in these organizations live and breathe their work; they have the idea that their work will change the present standards. These organizations do not give unnecessary attention to differences in matters like appearances, dress codes and other formal customs. And it is evident that their creations have not only changed the living styles of present generations but that of the upcoming ones as well. Even though these hot groups have a short life span but they are considered to be most effective in dealing with crises. Whenever there is a crisis facing an organization, it is often seen that a small group of individuals are assigned the task to join forces and deal with it so as to minimize its effect on the organization, those groups are the hot groups. Thus it is necessary for organization to motivate such team structures in their organizations wherever appropriate so as to inspire some degree of innovation in its operations (Lipman-Blumen & Leavitt, 2009). With ever growing organizations, the numbers of employees are also bound to increase, as larger the operational bases are the greater the numbers of employees are required to carry out those operations effectively. Studies have been carried out to analyze the effect of the team size on the team performance. According to a study performed on the team structures of two team-based private manufacturing companies, the team size has no direct correlation and effect on the employees’ commitment to their work and work place, however it was also found that the employees who had positive attitude towards their production work teams were more committed to their work than those employees who show negative or neutral perceptions (Ogungbamila et al, 2010). Designing a team structure is not the only aspect of work team that requires the management’s attention, managing these teams is also very important. In order to ensure efficient results from the teams, it is necessary that the teams should be positively managed. Motivation is a vital component when it comes to the team management. As many individuals come together under one team structure to achieve a common goal, the question arises as to how these individuals should be kept motivated so that their work performance is not compromised. Motivation is an important tool in order to maximize the effectiveness of the output from the team members. There have been literally thousands of researches conducted in order to understand what motivates a team. Many behavioral approaches have been designed that could lead to increased efficiency of a team so that the team members can combine their individual resources and apply them in order to achieve the common task assigned to that team. Besides these behavioral approaches many tools and applications have also been put into motion to achieve this goal. Many researches that have been conducted in this aspect have shown that maximizing team efficiency is an important factor in today’s work environment and many resources are being utilized daily to design more and more tools that could lead to the increase in team efficiencies (Kozlowski & Ilgen, 2006). Besides motivation, another important aspect of work groups and teams is conflict resolution. When a group of individuals work together, disagreements are bound to arise. The effective management of work teams tends to resolve these issues before they increase in magnitude, because serious disagreements can affect the performance of the team as a whole. Many techniques have been introduced by researchers to contribute towards conflict resolution. Through these techniques there are many ways to minimize or even eliminate common problems like personality clashes or wastage of time. In order to minimize conflicts, decisions can be made through a simple voting procedure and efforts should be made so that these procedures can be carried out peacefully. Through effective management, problems that arise among the team members can be identified beforehand, and can be resolved even if there are no predefined solutions available. For conflict resolution it is vital that group members should develop some social bonds among themselves and it can be achieved through arranging pre-meeting tasks that could be carried out by the team members, this will not only save time but will also encourage full participation on the team members’ behalf (Fox, 1987). Work groups and teams are an important part of today’s work environment. For their effectiveness and efficiency it is very important to define the team structure carefully. Every team structure should be designed by keeping the operations of the organizations in mind, so that maximum output could be derived from the team’s efforts. Although there are many team structures defined in the researches that are conducted through time, it is important to keep the organizational and current technological needs in mind before constructing a work environment. Establishing a work team is not the only aspect of an effective work environment, there are many other tasks associated with it. Once the work teams have been carefully designed and put into place, they should be properly managed so that organizations can benefit by their collective efforts. Bibliography Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. (2002). Multinational work teams: A new perspective. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates Griffin, R. W., & Moorhead, G. (2012). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning. Lumsden, G., Lumsden, D. L., & Wiethoff, C. (2010).Communicating in groups and teams: Sharing leadership. Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning Voutsas, K. (2011). Effects of Heterogeneity in Work Teams: Creativity and Conflict? Insights To A Changing World Journal (5), 115-120. LIPMAN-BLUMEN, J., & LEAVITT, H. J. (July 01, 2009). Beyond Typical Teams:. Hot Groups and Connective Leaders. Organizational Dynamics, 38, 3, 225-233. Ogungbamila, B., Ogungbamila, A., & Adetula, G. A. (December 01, 2010). Effects of team size and work team perception on workplace commitment: Evidence from 23 production teams. Small Group Research, 41, 6, 725-745. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Fox, W. M. (1987). Effective group problem solving: How to broaden participation, improve decision making, and increase commitment to action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Work Groups and Teams Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
Work Groups and Teams Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/human-resources/1766706-work-groups-and-teams
(Work Groups and Teams Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Work Groups and Teams Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/human-resources/1766706-work-groups-and-teams.
“Work Groups and Teams Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/human-resources/1766706-work-groups-and-teams.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Work Groups and Teams

Solving HRM Issues

Despite the fact that not much research has happened on groups and teams in organizations as challenges and issues for Human Resource Managers but it definitely is one of the challenges and issues.... Therefore, it becomes extremely important for them to understand groups and work teams, behaviors of individuals in groups, and other myths and variables associated with groups and teams.... It has selected “workgroups and teams” issue as the topic for discussion....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Adam Aircraft Work Group/Team

Thus, they were motivated to work as hard as possible to ensure that the plane was complete by that time.... The team was able to work faster, they coordinated with each other effectively and everyone was aware of the ultimate goal.... The case study involves Adam Aircraft....
1 Pages (250 words) Case Study

Unit 8: Groups, Teams, and Teambuilding

Expansive patterns of thinking have been confirmed to develop collective aspiration in teams (Senge, 1990).... Exercise 16-1: List and describe the types of teams most commonly used in your organization.... he teams used in my organization are functional and cross-functional in nature.... Cross functional teams also exist in the system where apart from the nursing tasks, administrative tasks are shared by specific individuals (Borkowski, 2009)....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Business Groups and Teams

The core work performed by the team is to provide loans to small and medium enterprise, which may include microfinance, real… Once we have given the loans to the customer it was our responsibility to look after the post services as well. According to the test taken online “Team Work Survey” it has been concluded that we have groups and teams 26th June, groups and teams I work for one of the most prestigious banks of the country and I am the Team Leader for Assets, in commercial banking....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Qatar Fencing Federation Organizational Behavior and Management

They lacked enthusiasm in the federation's affairs as was indicated by their constant lack of attendance in the teams' practice sessions.... This paper outlines management and leadership, motivation, the team at work, features of the group and the team.... A leader is supposed to be a motivator and inspire the followers while a manager's work is to plan and organize....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Research Brief for HR Development

Enhancing the effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.... They improve the working relationship of colleagues at work; thus improving work performance (Kozlowski & Ilgen, 2006).... It is the work of HRD HRD in the Implementation of Team-building Activities Insert Insert s Human Resource Development is the model in which an organization implements to help its employees in developing their organizational and personal abilities, skills and knowledge....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Teams in organizations

Work Groups and Teams in Organizations.... Problem-solving teams comprise of employees from the same department who meet regularly to discuss ways to the improve quality, efficiency and working environment in organizations.... Organizations are now relying more and… Self-managed teams usually take the responsibilities of their former supervisors.... Fully self-managed teams select their members whereby each member can evaluate the other member's performance....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

The Success of a Conflict Resolution - How Do Teams Differ From Groups at Work

This paper "The Success of a Conflict Resolution - How Do teams Differ From Groups at Work?... focuses on the fact that the major differences between teams and groups are that there exist groups in organisations which are not necessarily teams while teams are, as a matter of fact, groups.... nbsp; … Sims and Manz, (1995) further note that groups only develop into teams the moment they embrace cooperation and oneness....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us