Interexuality Frankenstein Essay
Intertexuality Frankenstein Essay Mary Shelley and Mel Brooks both held a love for the character of Frankenstein but both showed him in extremely various ways. Mary Shelley’s novel and Mel brooks Movie both were really enjoyable however the differences they hold are so abstract it’s hard to believe they might be related. Not just were the stories unusually different but so were the social and historic cultures in which both Mary Shelley and Mel Brooks Created their versions of Frankenstein.
Mary Shelley composed Frankenstein in the summer season of 1831. During the time in her journal she composed, “However it showed a wet, unenviable summertime, and perpetual rain typically confined us for days to your home.” This Journal entry that she composed makes me believe that the weather in the summertime of 1831 helped formed her writing of Frankenstein. Mary Shelley based Frankenstein around a gothic and dark age, and the theme of Frankenstein might actually send out chills up the readers spine.
Within Frankenstein the sublime natural world, welcomed by Romanticism (late eighteenth century to mid-nineteenth century) as a source of unrestrained psychological experience for the individual, initially uses characters the possibility of spiritual renewal. Mary Shelley set a more severe social and historic culture for her variation of Frankenstein, however it was essential to do in order to create such a stunning scary story. The reader is so drawn into Victor’s world and the production of Frankenstein, that they also become major about the job at hand.
The social and historic culture Mary Shelley produced within the book is actually what set the book apart from Mel Brook’s film, Young Frankenstein. Mel Brook on the other hand produced a funny version of Frankenstein, and yet still held on to the basis of what Mary Shelley developed when she wrote Frankenstein. The motion picture, Young Frankenstein, came out in theaters in December of 1974, this was more than a decade after Mary Shelley’s novel and the twist of the motion picture set a completely different social and historical culture of that time.
The social and historic culture of Young Frankenstein is far more innovative and far more appropriate for that time. Although, the motion picture can be stated to be rather outrageous and extremely opposite of the book, it was still a significant hit. The crazy thing Mel Brooks did do is keep the film in black and white, attempting to signify the time period in which he desired the film set, this I believe assisted relate the film to the book Mary Shelley wrote. Mel Brook’s ut an interesting spin on the movie compared to the book, but he did it in a way that the audience might still take pleasure in Mary Shelley’ development of Frankenstein also. Frankenstein, and Young Frankenstein hold two various social and historical cultures, and both were equally enjoyable. I make certain Mary Shelley and Mel Brook’s would both be disappointed with the others production, however in an audiences perspective it’s all just as much as the readers or audiences viewpoint of which they like more, and a great deal of that involves which social and historical culture you connect to more.