StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Hague Visby Rules - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
According to the paper 'The Hague Visby Rules', the follow-up to the Hague Rules is better known as The Hague Visby Rules. These rules are designed to regulate the movement of goods by sea and target the relationship of the shipper and the carrier. The Hague-Visby Rules were drafted in 1968 and were last modified in 1979…
Download free paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.2% of users find it useful
The Hague Visby Rules
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Hague Visby Rules"

? Background The follow up to the Hague Rules is better known as The Hague Visby Rules. These rules are designed to regulate the movement of goods bysea and target the relationship of the shipper and the carrier. The Hague Visby Rules were drafted in 1968 and were last modified in 1979. The major premise of all these rules was to circumvent lacunae. Moreover, the contract of carriage and bills of lading were also attended to as well as incorporation by reference1. The Hague Visby Rules have been adopted by all major shipping nations while the older Hamburg Rules have been enforced by twenty six nations only. It is reported that the Hague Visby Rules are unclear from text and that case law has served to remove the various ambiguities in it. Hague Visby Rules’ Standalone Status The amendments to the Brussels convention of 1924 are considered to be the Hague Visby Rules. Therefore the Hague Visby Rules cannot be considered as an isolated document. Article 6 of the Rules clarifies this position strongly. Moreover, if any nation chooses to adopt The Hague Visby Rules then it is bound by them2. This indicates that the Hague Visby Rules are clear as far as their ratification is concerned. Force of Law behind The Hague Visby Rules The decision of an English court over the Vita Food Products v Unus Shipping Co3 held that the Hague Rules did not possess the force of the law. The court declared that the Hague Rules in fact held effect by agreement rather than through law especially as they did not possess a paramount clause. The Hague Visby Rules were an attempt to treat this issue. In the case of the Hague Rules, nations were free to choose the extent to which these rules were applied. However, as mentioned above The Hague Visby Rules stipulated that adopting these laws meant being bound by them fully. Article 10 of the rules clearly states that any contracting state observing these rules will apply them as “the force of the law”. As a result most nations implementing the Hague Visby Rules have made them part of local laws such as Canada and Britain. Britain has incorporated the Hague Visby Rules by carving them as the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 19714 while Canada has adopted them as the Marine Liability Act5. This essentially clarifies that the Hague Visby Rules are unambiguous as far as their adoption is concerned. Moreover, for all practical purposes nations that have not adopted the Hague Visby Rules are still bound by them because these Rules are in effect the world over. Non participatory nations observe the Hague Visby Rules whenever they utilise international instruments or utilise the equivalent laws from any contracting state such as by referencing within the bill of lading. Paramount Clause and the Hague Visby Rules The Hague Rules were weakened primarily due to the possession of paramount clauses. The presence of paramount clause forced nations using these Rules to look for paramount clauses explicitly within contracts. This was manifest in the initial standing of the Privy Council in Vita Food Products v Unus Shipping Co.3 case. However, the Privy Council soon reverted their stand and later the new position turned into standard practice. Such lacuna does not exist in The Hague Visby Rules especially in light of Article 10 that was remodelled as: “Each contracting state shall apply the provisions6 ...” This declaration ensured that the application of the Hague Visby Rules does not require any paramount clause. Furthermore, any nation’s legislation that previously required the presence of a paramount clause has been dissuaded from doing so. All provisions under the Hague Visby Rules are treated equally as there is no paramount clause. Bill of Lading in The Hague Visby Rules Bills of lading are considered the best possible evidence for contracts. Moreover, any bill of lading need not be a carriage contract. Multiple cases have affirmed this point of view. A notable example is The Ardennes7 and Saint John Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. Ltd. v Kingsland Maritime Corp8. etc. the contract is seen to be the sum total of advertisements, the booking note, the freight tariff as well as any other conditions that may have been settled between the carrier and the shipper. All carriage contracts that are carried out come under the domain of The Hague Visby Rules. These contracts could be either written or oral except contracts that relate to commercial trade undertakings as explained in Article 6. There is some ambiguity in these Rules as articles 1(b) and 2 state applications to bills of lading but article 3(8) declares these Rules to be of public order. In a similar manner article (6) declares that the Rules can only be bypassed by issuing certain non negotiable receipts in certain circumstances. The combination of article 1(b), article 2, article 3(8) and article 6 seems to delineate that the Hague Visby Rules apply to all carriage contracts except to certain goods under non negotiable receipts that lie in line with article 69. National coasting trade is also attended in a similar manner when allowed through national statue. Minor exceptions to these positions exist which include: goods mentioned in the bill of lading to be carried on the vessel’s deck; living animals. The combination of the articles mentioned above present an argument that is bolstered by court rulings as well as relevant discussion by authors. On the other hand, traditionally article 1(b) of the Hague Visby Rules is used to regulate various “bills of lading and similar documents of title” which are treated as negotiable carriage documents. This stands true unless a particular statute allows these Rules to extend waybills and other non negotiable receipts. A strong example is presented through the ruling over The European Enterprise10 where the Hague Visby Rules were deemed inapplicable unless the carriage contract created empowered the shipper to ask for a bill of lading either during or after the shipment. This position was deemed acceptable to warrant that the Rules did not govern any non negotiable consignment notes or other similar document. Another similar example stems from The Happy Ranger11. Here L. J. Tuckey challenged the traditional view point that non negotiable bills of lading were not technically bills of lading. Given this situation of ambiguity under law, both the norms of statute construction as well as statute interpretation under the Hague Visby Rules militate that the Rules oversee waybills too except of course in specified circumstances under article 6 and during cabotage, only if national law permits it. This kind of recognition would clear up ambiguities and would let the Rules aid international shipping better12. Waybills The Hague Visby Rules can be seen to apply to waybills (non negotiable receipts) except of course if the shipment is: concerned with non commercial trade; concerned with national coasting within the boundaries of national law. The case of The Chitra13 may be referred to in this regard. In this case, a “straight consigned bill of lading” (which implies a nominative bill of lading under which the goods are delivered to a specified consignee only) was assimilated in the same manner as a waybill. Situations where no Bill of Lading is issued The Hague Visby Rules as well as The Hague Rules are both applicable to carriage contract that is covered by a bill of lading or any other similar document. It does not matter if the bill of lading was actually issued. This is because the bill of lading is not deemed as a contract of carriage but is generally the best evidence as per the carriage contract14. The contract itself is composed of the booking note, tariff requirements, carrier’s advertisements, shipper’s special demands etc. All of these components are incorporated as a single piece. Though the situation seems ambiguous but case law has established it. Delvin J. formed the criteria of whether a bill of lading had been intended and not whether a bill of lading had been issued in the Pyrene Co. v Scindia Steam Navigation Co15. case. Similar to this case, the Canadian Supreme Court took a similar position in Pyrene Co., Ltd. v St. Amand16 where a $500 per package limit was imposed as a bill of lading had not been issued although a bill of lading had been intended. In contrast to the above, the Hague Visby Rules do not apply in case that a bill of lading is not issued but a charterparty is contemplated. This can be seen clearly from the judgement on the Canada Steamship Lines Ltd. v Desgagne’17. On the other hand, in The Beltana18 shipping receipts were issued in place of bills of lading. Another case is presented by St. Lawrence Construction Ltd.v Federal Commerce and Navigation Co. Ltd.19 where the involved parties went into contract through letters to carry construction supplies and equipment. An annexure was attached consisting of a standard bill of lading. Consequently, the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal applied the Pyrene judgement and judged that a bill of lading had been contemplated. This meant that the carrier was provided the benefit. In all of these circumstances and cases listed above, it is clear that the Hague Visby Rules offer ambiguous treatment of these circumstances. Consequently, case law has been required to substantiate these aspects and other related aspects. Cargo Not Received In case that the carrier does not receive the intended goods although a bill of lading has been issued, then The Hague Visby Rules do not apply at all. The reason behind this is because the carriage contract has not commenced as yet. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. American Line S.S. Corp. is a related case in point where no fault was found with the carrier20. Conclusion The Hague Visby Rules can be seen as an improvement over the Hague Rules. However, the original text of the Hague Visby Rules is ambiguous in large part but case laws have progressively clarified ambiguities. The applicability of the Hague Visby Rules in terms of their adoption is clear but the technical aspects of implementation remain unclear in large part. However, the Rules have had the distinction of being able to combine the varying points of views over international cargo and shipping. This has meant that over time most nations have adopted these Rules and all other nations have been bound by the application of these rules. The Hague Visby Rules may be unclear but their due application and the resulting case laws have established its position on dispute issues clearly. Bibliography Admirality Law Hague Visby Rules (2011) http://www.admiraltylaw.com/statutes/hague.html Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, (1979, London, McGraw Hill) Euro Transport Solutions Hague Visby Rules Commentary (2005) http://www.eurotransport-solutions.com/documentos/Hague-Visby%20Comments.pdf Sir Frederick Pollock, First Book of Jurisprudence, (2001, London, MacMillan) Tetly, International Maritime and Admiralty Law, (2002, Yvon Blais Inc.) Tetley, William, Interpretation and Construction of The Hague, Hague Visby and Hamburg Rules (2004) http://www.mcgill.ca/files/maritimelaw/rulesinterpretation.pdf Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“International Logestic & Management (LAW) Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/literature/1429465-international-logestic-management-law
(International Logestic & Management (LAW) Essay)
https://studentshare.org/literature/1429465-international-logestic-management-law.
“International Logestic & Management (LAW) Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/literature/1429465-international-logestic-management-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Hague Visby Rules

Carriage of Goods by Sea

Specifically Article X of The Hague Visby Rules 1968 provide that: The provisions of these Rules shall apply to every bill of lading relating to the carriage of goods between ports in two different States if (a) The bill of lading is issued in contracting State, or (b) The carriage is form a port in a contracting State.... Liability for Damages and Loss for the Carriage of Goods by Sea under the Hague/visby rules All claims and liabilities arising out of the aborted voyage of the MV Costanzia involve the charter party between Bushey Lines and Hadley Marine Ltd....
18 Pages (4500 words) Coursework

The Impact of the Hague-Visby Rules in Relation to Duties of a Carrier

Critically assess the impact of the Hague-visby rules in relation to duties of a carrier....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Maritime Commerce Issues

II.... Introduction 1 III Legal theories and concepts and laws regulating maritime commerce 2 ... ... s required by the assignment, this paper consists of two parts, the first one dwelling on the legal concepts that regulate maritime commerce; the application of legal theory for the resolution of problems; the principles and techniques involved in dispute management; the various laws of maritime commerce and the tools and resources these utilize....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

International Trade and Maritime Law

This paper compares the Hamburg Rules and The Hague Visby Rules for the carriage of goods by sea.... Two such extremely laws or rules are the Hamburg Rules and The Hague Visby Rules for the carriage of goods by sea.... hereas the Hague-visby rules denotes the Scope of Coverage as an implication where it covers the period of time when the goods are loaded on the ship to the time they are discharged from the ship.... hereas under the Hague-visby rules in relation to Carrier Liability or Duty of Care it states that the carrier must exercise due diligence to 1....
9 Pages (2250 words) Coursework

The Hague Rules

The Protocol was signed in this respect on 23 February 1968 at Visby on the Swedish Island and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1971 was passed by the UK Government with effect to the protocol and re-enacted Hague Rules and hague visby rules.... 5 The most important obligations under Hague or hague visby rules are those imposed by Art.... he Hague Rules were adopted in 1924, The Hague/visby rules in 1968 and 1979 and the Hamburg Rules in 1978....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Law of International Carriage of Goods by Sea

The contract between TC and Susan for the trans-shipment of a consignment of Russian vodka from Russia to the United Kingdom is governed by the Hague-visby rules.... The Hague-visby rules will apply since they were expressly incorporated by virtue of the voyage charter party.... Be that as it may, the Hague-visby rules will typically apply either by their own force or ex proprio vigour to contracts for the carriage of goods which are supported by bills of lading or similar title deeds....
18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

Hague Visby Rules

Similarly, if the merchandise to be transported comprises of deck cargo, then parties are not obliged to apply The Hague Visby Rules.... The paper "hague visby rules " says that it in maritime law relate to parties dealing with shipping goods by sea.... t should be noted that the hague rules can apply to a given situation even when a bill of lading was not issued.... The rules apply to a number of states; however, the manner of implementation differs from state to state....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Application of the Hague Visby Rules

The main purpose of this essay "Application of The Hague Visby Rules" is introducing The Hague Visby Rules to afford a set of rules and conditions to govern liabilities during the Carriage of Goods by Sea.... The Hague and the Hague/visby rules are designed to serve this purpose.... In the normal course, it is agreed by member countries that Hague/visby rules would apply for all cases, except certain exceptional circumstances, all contracts of carriage of goods by sea, whether performed by mouth, or written, and not including cases under Article....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us