Storyteller in a Rose for Emily by Faulkner
The essay that I? m going to do has to do with A Rose for Emily, which was composed by William Faulkner and was it was his very first work published in a nationwide magazine. In the introduction of the essay I? m going to stablish the context in which we can find A Rose for Emily. It is a narrative included in the collection called the Village, collection that also consists of numerous works like DRY SEPTEMBER, HAIR OR THE NIGHT SUN.
The operate in this collection have 3 things in common, the neighborhood, which as we are visiting an extremely important character as an entire, the solitude of humans which in the case of Miss Emily is what makes us have compassion with this female, but also is what makes us see her as a victim. Lastly, something these works have in common is that they are constructed by the point of view of an uncommon narrator. I say this in the sense that it is unusual to find a storyteller which for example in the case of A ROSE FOR EMILY does not understand whatever about what is really happening during the story.
In this essay the main task is going to be to develop all the qualities about this weird storyteller. The very first question I? ve thought the most important to begin with is WHAT’S THE TYPE OF STORYTELLER, does he or she know whatever in the story? This question has to possible answers, as the storyteller does not know everythin about Miss Emily, he doesn? t understand what is her thinking or what are her fellings. On the other hand, the narrator appears to know whatever from the viewpoint of the neighborhood, he understands what females consider Emily he understands that people in the neighborhood are going to ask her to pay her taxes, and so on ut the important things is that he doesn’t understand what each member of the neighborhood believes, or what each member of the community does, speaks, feels, and so on. The conclusion to which i? ve gotten here is that the storyteller knows some things, but not everything, neither by the perspective of Miss Emily neither by the perspective of the neighborhood. The 2nd concern is … is the storyteller inside the story (intradiegetic) or outside?
The alternance of the pronouns “we”, and “they” might be confussing but even sometimes he states “they” making refference to the neighborhood is not because he is not there, but to be more unbiased, not to be totally involved in whatever the neighborhood did. It might be because in my opinion the neighborhood is responsible for Miss Emily’s privacy and consequently of her unusual behaviour, and the storyteller wishes to be apart, not involved. Considering this, we may ask ourselves if the storyteller is objective in the story. He looks like a mere viewer of Miss Emily and the community.
Likewise, he does not criticise her, so in this way he is objective. However, if we again consider that is a member of the neighborhood we can rule out him unbiased at all, as in the story we can see what’s the viewpoint of the community: We had long idea of them as a tableau. We have discuss the type of narrator, and the second point for a more research study is WHO’S REALLY THE NARRATOR? Do we know if the narrator is a guy or a lady? It’s age? In the very first lines of the story we discover to different mindsets towards Emily depending on the gender of the neighborhood members.
The guys are referred to as considerate, while ladies are thought about curious gossiping everytime they can. So understand, if we consider that in some cases the storyteller is really curious which she knows what women in the neighborhood say to each other, simply as if she is one of the women in the community that goes to have some tea to her neighbour’s home (“”Simply as if a male– any man– might keep a cooking area properly, “the women said”). On the other hand, he is really respectful with her, like men in the community treat her. He does not state any clear viewpoint about Miss Grieson.
We can even claim that it is a group of the people, that it? s not just a person the one that is informing the story. All in all, we do not get here to a clear conclusion, we can consider the storyteller as a man, a female or a group of individuals. We are visiting that the same take place when we try to develop the age of the narrator. Is it a member of the Old Generation or the New one? The old generation treated her as a member of the nobility. The brand-new generation treat Miss Emily as one more, a person who needs to pay her taxes. We put on? be familiar with it due to the fact that there are unclear declarations that make the storyteller’s age clear, we understand how each generation treats her, however we put on? t understand to what member the narrator belongs to. Many critics have claimed that the narrator is not a member of the community, but a person who had been told the story. Nevertheless in my opinion this is not possible at all as in the story we have several discussions, we have the words that the characters said. So it is really tough to believe that the story has been distinguished generation to generation and we have the specific words stated by Miss Emily or a few of the inhabitants in Jefferson.
The final point of my essay is the linearity of the story. The truth that the story informed is a flashback informed in the previous tense is something that makes us question: why does the storyteller informed the story with does spectacular dives through time? As the story is informed in the previous tense we know that the narrator already knew that Homer Barron was dead. Why is this concealed until the end? Possibly the answer to this question is that the narrator desired us to know all the realities that conditoned Miss Emily’s life prior to we start judging her.
Since, what would you have considered Miss Emily if you knew that her sweet love was death in her bed? My viewpoint would have been that she was crazy, that she was a muderess. So by the dives through time the storyteller obtains a various response from us, we feel pity, somekind of identification, all in all we feel that she is the victim. Furthermore, if we take into account that the descriptions of Miss Emily are constantly made as potraits is another fact that make us enjoy her and her story as if it was a photo, having our own viewpoints of what’s happening, what might be her felings, and so on
. Finally I want to state that apart from other things, the kind of narrator is what makes this story a work of art, since the method which the story is informed makes us be interested about the end. Likewise it makes us be on the one hand in favour of Miss Emily, but on the other hand, often we are just as another of the community trying to know more about what’s occurring and being curious about what’s concealed behind that lonesome figure.