StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Persuasive Narrative in Rhetoric - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "Persuasive Narrative in Rhetoric" will considerably focus on pathos, logos, ethos, and their individual effect on persuasion in regards to narrative rationale. Pathos, logos, and ethos are the three pillars of public speaking…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.2% of users find it useful
Persuasive Narrative in Rhetoric
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Persuasive Narrative in Rhetoric"

?Persuasive Narrative in Rhetoric Narrativity is the relationship that exists between content and expression in a text or between a text and its inner meaning. Narratives help in organization and instilling sense in people’s lives. The definite meaning of any narrative can however not be understood by simply reading a narrative. It takes more than just reading to comprehend the inner meaning of a narrative. Symbols, sayings, and in-depth objects are creating hidden interpretations in a narrative. Some narratives could be ironical, and others rhetorical. However there are principles of narrative analysis that help in analyzing a narrative with a purpose of proper understanding. There are three main principles of narrative analysis. They are the principle of succession, principle of transformation, and the principle of mediation. The paper will use these principles in explaining the persuasive use of narrative rhetoric in Obama’s inaugural speech. Rhetoric is this case is the aspect of speaking effectively. The paper will also use narrative rationality to explain the persuasive effect of narrative in rhetoric. This paper will considerably focus on patho, logos, ethos, and their individual effect on persuasion in regards to narrative rational. Pathos, logos, and ethos are the three pillars of public speaking. They are the rhetoric styles of persuasion. I will use examples from the Obama inaugural speech to illustrate each of these points. The paper will then draw an informed conclusion on persuasive use of narrative in rhetoric. The Principle of succession is present in Obama’s inaugural speech. The Principle of succession relies on time and change to explain the meaning of the sequential arrangement of objects, elements, and incidents in a narrative (Scharf, 2003). Everything is in time. Stage for the speech was perfectly set in front of building constructed by black slaves. The speech is filled by words signifying sequential events, “I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors” (New York Times, 2009). These words seek to persuade the audience on his concern for the job at hand. The use of incidents like rising tides, still waters, clouds, and ranging storms is also sequential. They seek to persuade the audience that things and situations change with time and hence they should brace themselves for that change. Additionally, the use of incidents like the abandonment in the capital, when the enemy was advancing and the staining of the snow with blood, play a major role in persuading the audience that their history has not been good and hence the need to change it. This principle consequently leads to the principle of transformation. The principle of transformation relies on unities to define patterns that signify change in state of mind or state of affairs and hence defining the beginnings and endings. There is massive use of this principle in Obama’s inaugural speech. The phrase, “Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America” (New York Times, 2009) signify change in the state of affairs. These words seek to persuade the audience that it is time to act towards good for America. Other words that signify change of state of mind are, “Our capacity remains undiminished, but our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions” (New York Times, 2009). These too persuade the audience that change is irresistible at this time. It marks the beginning of putting off unpleasant decisions and the end of protecting narrow interests. Moreover, from the energy in his words and the applause that he receives it is sure that Obama and the American people are ready for this change and hence the eminent success in narrative persuasion. This principle additionally leads to the principle of mediation. The principle of mediation relies on desire and ability to get a better understanding of the environment hence conveying the deeper meaning of content. Obama confirms to the audience that they are in amidst of a crisis, their nation is at war, and their economy is weakening and their health costly (New York Times, 2009). He seeks to draw their understanding on the burdens he has inherited from the previous government. However, he turns the burden to all by denoting that although the government is able and mandated to sort these burden it the faith and determination of American that holds the nation. In doing this, he is seeking understanding on the fact that it will take everybody’s effort for America to flourish. The three principles arguably manifest their input in persuading the audience in the narrative rhetoric. Narrative rationality is how the audience relates with the narrative. It depends on whether the narrative is coherent, complete, and characters are consistent. It also depends on narrative fidelity, which demands that the story correlates with our ideas, our lives, values, and experiences. The absence of a narrative rationale despises any act of persuasion in rhetoric. The Obama’s inaugural speech manifests its rationality to persuade the audience. The speech is whole and the speaker and the audience are consistent. He starts the speech by recognizing the American citizens and ends with blessings over America and its people (New York Times, 2009). This demonstrates the completeness of the speech. This explains persuasive effect in how the people identifies with his blessings and recognition. The constant applauds in course of the speech confirms the connection of the people with the speaker. They applaud where their ideas, values, and lives correlate with that of the speaker. This aids a great deal in persuading the audience as it confirms that the audience is attentive and absorbs the message to their hearts. Pathos, logos, and ethos are pillars of public speaking. They are persuasive appeals and are very significant in any rhetoric. There is a clear manifestation of the three pillars in the Obama’s inaugural speech. The form the basis of a narrative analysis and their use qualifies contents of literature. Ethos defines the trustworthiness, character, or credibility of the speaker. To achieve this, the speaker must use an appropriate language to the audience, observe sincerity, restrict himself to the subject matter, and present a reasonable presentation (Henning, 1998). Ethos comes with respect and authority. Indeed, Ethos is the most significant pillar in that if the audience does not have trust with the speaker, they will not care to listen and hence cannot draw persuasion from his rhetoric. In the speech, Obama establishes his bona fides by tracing his roots from the grandest capital to the small village where his father was born. He again notes that in earlier years, he would not have demanded respect but now he qualifies for the most sacred oath (New York Times, 2009). By doing this, he demonstrates his humble background, his humility, and authority to give his speech. He uses an appropriate language and grammar in addressing the audience. The applause he receives after these remarks confirms the success of his ethical appeal. This becomes an effective persuasive mode for the audience believes in him and is willing to listen to him. They identify with his ideas and values by applauding. Pathos defines the emotional connection of the speaker to the audience. It persuades the audience with an appeal to their emotions of patriotism, love, or joy. To achieve this, the speaker must use vivid and emotional languages, narrate on emotional events, and use an emotional tone (Edlund, 2012). In the speech, Obama established an emotional bond with the audience by stating that his father of 88 years rang with tears from England to congratulate him (New York Times, 2009). He also pledged to help poor nations and narrated on how their fore fathers fought for independence. This evoked sympathy and emotional response. This serves a significant step in persuading the audience as they are compelled to listen and act. In fact, they remain attentive up to when their emotions prescribe applause to the speaker. The emotional connection also justifies the rationality of the speech to the American citizens. They believe in what he is saying and hence the persuasion to act accordingly. Logos defines the logical argument of the speaker. While Ethos and pathos can convince the public, logos convince the academicians. To achieve this, the speaker must use definitions, abstract language, informed opinions and factual data and statistics (Edlund, 2012). In the speech, Obama drew a logical argument and cognitive response. He argued that although the power of the market to generate wealth and expand very real, the recent marker crisis proved that the nation could not prosper by only favoring the prosperous but by giving an equal chance to any willing citizen (New York Times, 2009). This argument was logical enough to convince and persuade the academicians. The fact that he identifies with the market crisis America is facing, he defines his connection with the people hence the rationale. Conclusion It is worth noting that literature is not only based on principles of narrativity and the three pillars of public speaking only but also on narrative rationale. Where there is no narrative rationale, it is almost impossible to attain the desired goal of the rhetoric because the audience will not be receptive. Additionally, given that one principle of narrativity leads to another, then, a defined sequence must be in application in analyzing persuasive use of narrative in rhetoric. Any good piece of literature possesses these factors in totality. Obama’s inaugural speech is very relevant in demonstrating the persuasive use of narrative in rhetoric. It considerably harbors most of these principles, and pillars in clear definition. I will thus qualify this speech as a good piece of literature. References Edlund, J. (2012). Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade. Retrieved from http://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/jgarret/3waypers.htm Henning, M. (1998). A General Summary of Aristotle's Appeals. Retrieved from http://courses.durhamtech.edu/perkins/aris.html New York Times. (2009). “Barack Obama’s Inaugural Address”. New York Times Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/20/us/politics/20text-obama.html?pagewanted=all Scharf, H. (2003). “Grand Principles of Narratology”. Hum. Retrieved from http://www.hum.aau.dk/~scharfe/pala2003sch.pdf Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Persuasive Narrative in Rhetoric Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1443314-explain-the-persuasive-use-of-narrative-in
(Persuasive Narrative in Rhetoric Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1443314-explain-the-persuasive-use-of-narrative-in.
“Persuasive Narrative in Rhetoric Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1443314-explain-the-persuasive-use-of-narrative-in.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Persuasive Narrative in Rhetoric

Rhetoric from renaissance to modern day

rhetoric, being an art of speaking or writing persuasively to convey certain impressions, or promote concrete interpretations, especially to support the power of a speech or a text to reveal the truth, has always played a very important practical role in the history of development of man as a sentient being.... In this light, study of rhetoric means not only examination of some modes of language usage, but may lead to a better understanding of cognitive processes. It is important to understand from the very beginning, that the division of the history of rhetoric into periods is somewhat conventional....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Evolution and Future of Rhetoric in Electronic Age

It is easy to term This means there is further evolution in store for rhetoric and it cannot become obsolete however, classical rhetoric may never regain its lost position.... In this paper, rhetoric has been discussed from various aspects from its origin to evolution, post-modern theory of rhetoric and the challenges it faces from electronic media.... From ancient times rhetoric has served as the perfect art of discourse, which allows a speaker/writer/researcher to enlighten, motivate and even persuade a given set of audience and/or readers....
13 Pages (3250 words) Research Paper

Recalling the functions of rhetoric

The choice of narrative type is an essay, and it plays a role in the function of rhetoric.... Kenneth Burke's concept of identification plays a role through the traditional aspect of rhetoric as a form of persuasion.... In the narrative, Roiphe persuades women to strive for equality with men, and not endeavor for superiority over men....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The History & Theory of Rhetoric

This paper demonstrates the view and different approach of famous philosophers to rhetoric.... nbsp;… According to Aristotle, there are three kinds of rhetoric: the deliberative rhetoric (one the aims to establish the usefulness or the harmfulness of a proposed or future action); forensic rhetoric (the kind that defends or accuse, referring to past acts and circumstances; and, the epideictic or celebratory rhetoric (the kind that eulogize or diseulogize, presenting facts or events, particularly the one recommending those who are worthy of praise or blame)....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

An Exploration of Rhetorical Discourse

hellip; The Greek tradition of rhetoric recognizes its subject as an invention.... Moreover, the teaching of rhetoric in ancient Greece is concerned mainly with schooling in public discourse.... The art of rhetoric refers to embellished or exaggerated talk, such as that usually used in political speeches.... The art of rhetoric is an art of persuasion through cautiously constructed words.... Rhetor is a writer or a speaker; a mentor of rhetoric....
13 Pages (3250 words) Assignment

The Modern Rhetorical Practice Based in the Creation of a New Dialect of Language

The essay will analyze the argot or slang-language “Nadsat” using the strategies of classical and modern rhetoric, and in this context, Nadsat can be taken as an example in the larger whole of the novel 'A Clockwork Orange'.... For purposes of analysis in the context of rhetoric.... Furthermore, Nadsat will be analyzed not only in terms of the character's own rhetoric but in terms of the author's rhetoric.... With this example, the way that Nadsat is used by Burgess as a rhetoric device to build sympathy and identification, even admiration despite his character's morally reprehensible actions, the essay will look at this rhetorical tactic by the author in three contexts: 1....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

How Rhetoric Is Applicable in the Modern Setting

Hence when in rhetoric attacking another party and their points is not the most valued manner of winning an argument.... The paper tackles the position and place of rhetoric in the modern culture which is becoming digital by the second.... Also, the paper reviews how if any rhetoric is applicable in the modern setting.... rhetoric is an art that concentrates on argument and also discourse.... While the people who study critical analysis of works associated with rhetoric are known as “rhetoricians”....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper

Emily Dickinson Poem Analysis

That is what Burke was talking about; according to him, alienation and is inevitable for human existence ad it is rhetoric that can break this vicious circle of separation (Burke) .... In Dickinson's case, it is bold, free, and very brave rhetoric, a possibility to proclaim that she is Nobody I the very first line that can help overcome alienation.... She wants someone special, someone, who could interpret her rhetoric in the right way....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us