In the world of Fahrenheit 451, intellectualism and independent thinking had actually ended up being abhorrent, making anti-intellectualism another style of the book. From the book: “With school ending up more runners, jumpers, racers, tinkerers, grabbers, snatchers, fliers, and swimmers rather of examiners, critics, knowers, and creative creators, the word”intellectual,” of course, ended up being the swear word it should have to be.” (58 )As a dystopian work, Fahrenheit 451 handle themes of human expression, individualism, and censorship.
While other books in the exact same category tend to deal with the overbearing nature of federal government and how it ruins uniqueness, Bradbury selected to demonstrate how individuals can oppress themselves if indoctrinated properly. The people living in the book’s degenerate future have actually been given all they think they require for cultural survival, while at the same time, they think that the written word is somehow wicked and subversive. By providing people the tools and the mindset needed to self-censor, the federal government has actually produced a self-perpetuating society of purposeful, self-satisfied lack of knowledge and neglect.Seen because light, Fahrenheit 451 becomes a cautionary tale that we might find out a lesson or three from, or at least stop taking a look at it as simply a book about censorship– which indicates government control– and rather look at its cautioning about a society that’s been doped up so high up on technology and so distracted by television that they’ve lost track of truth and independent thought, and turned away from reading books (because they are annoyed and upset by whatever) and the routines of idea and reflection.
One appropriate message of the story reveals that society can end up being so lazy and sidetracked that the most crucial aspects of an abundant life can be lost. There are two significant problems happening in the book. Initially, the unwritten law prohibits the spread of ideas through any kind of literature; so, they publicly burn the homes and books of the people who own them. The 2nd problem is that people get so involved their technology and entertainment that they do not recognize they are missing some valuable aspects of life, such as getting in touch with other individuals. “Nobody listens any more. I can’t talk to the walls because they’re chewing out me. I can’t talk to my other half; she listens to the walls. I just want somebody to hear what I have to say. And maybe if I talk long enough, it’ll make sense … We have everything we require to be pleased, however we aren’t happy. Something’s missing out on. I browsed. The only thing I favorably knew was gone was the books I ‘d burned in ten or twelve years. So I thought books may assist” (82 ). This passage definitely shows how this book is still relevant in our time, lots of people are so lazy that there minds home entertainment depends on the electronic compared to the wall. When we are totally engulfed in these electronics offering us entertainment which transferred to happiness we do not realise the value other things in our lives.While the book is most often categorized as a work of science fiction, it is first and primary a social criticism caution against the danger of censorship.
Fahrenheit 451 uses the category of sci-fi, which took pleasure in enormous popularity at the time of the book’s publication, as a car for his message that unattended oppressive government irreparably harmed society by limiting the imagination and freedom of its people. In specific, the “dystopia” theme popular in sci-fi– a futuristic technocratic and totalitarian society that requires order and harmony at the expense of individual rights– serves the novel well and makes it a classic even today.