The Crucible– Vengeance
When one is done wrong in a particularly painful or angering method, getting revenge is sometimes thought of as the most gratifying method of regaining ones sense of self worth. This plan, nevertheless, holds an immense possibility of backfiring in methods never imagined. In fact, the result of the circumstance at hand is often worsened than it may have been if this strategy is taken. Arthur Miller shows this in his terrible play The Crucible, by revealing the reader that although giving in to feelings of revenge is simple to do, choosing the course of forgiveness frequently causes much better results in the long run.
The primary way Miller relays this message is through the unethical relationship of the married John Proctor and his young servant Abigail Williams. Throughout their affair, Abigail concerned love John, and in her eyes, he enjoyed her too. So when Elizabeth, John’s partner, discovered what had been going on and the affair was given an abrupt stop, Abigail believed Elizabeth to be the only thing standing in the way of the 2 of them leading a pleased life together. John was required to stop seeing her; otherwise he faced losing his spouse and kids.
Upon being alone with him for the very first time since she was dismissed from their home, she noticed a modification in the way he acted towards her that she wasn’t partial to and specified “I try to find John Proctor that took me from my sleep and put knowledge in my heart! I never knew what pretense Salem was, I never knew the lying lessons I was taught by all these Christian females and their covenanted men! And now you bid me tear the light out of my eyes? I will not, I can not! You loved me, John Proctor, and whatever sin it is, you like me yet! in an attempt to bring him to coming to confront with the fact that deep down, he still enjoyed her as he once had (177 ). Abigail simply could not accept that he did not and possibly had actually never loved her in the way that she thought she loved him. Instead of accepting this and that she remained in the incorrect for being with a married man such as himself in the first location, Abigail choose instead to seek vengeance on Elizabeth, the woman in the method of her love. So she devised a strategy. Abigail proceeded to implicate Goody. Proctor of witchcraft, a heinous allegation that would probably cause her death.
Abigail appears to have believed that with his other half out of the method, she and John might be together again. Nevertheless, this was not the case, as John did not want his other half out of the way. Her thirst for revenge soon resulted in John disliking her. He concerned dislike her so much, in fact, that he affirmed against her to the court, heatedly stating; “She believes to dance with me on my wife’s grave! And well she might, for I considered her gently. God help me, I lusted, and there is a promise in such sweat. But it is a whore’s vengeance, and you need to see it! (220-221) in his attempt to show her an imposter, set on ruining his marriage for her own self-gain. John went to numerous extremes to prove Elizabeth’s innocence; consisting of forcing their home servant, Mary Warren, to testify to the reality that she had never ever seen any phantom or devil. Unfortunately for him, Mary Warren was not as brave as he had actually believed her to be. She eventually turned on him out of fear of she herself being maltreated and hanged, and accused John of witchcraft, something that Abigail had not intended on taking place.
Between this allegation and the testaments of all the girls, John Proctor was sentenced to death, as he refused to name any other “witches” or sign his name to his statement. This, quite clearly, was not the ending that Abigail had meant. Rather of winning his love and affection, she got his hatred and repulsion, and in due time, his death. Because of her yearning for vengeance, her precious John was gone. Had she taken the greater roadway and forgiven Elizabeth for what she, in reality, had ever ideal in doing, perhaps things could have ended much better with she and John.
For something, he would almost certainly be alive, which is vast improvement from him being dead. Also, Abigail may have stood a possibility of recovering a minimum of some of Elizabeth’s forgiveness if she would have seen her error and enabled Elizabeth to forgive her for the crime she had actually committed. In time, John and Abigail may have been capable of being at least acquaintances, which would have been better than absolutely nothing at all, if she genuinely liked him as she said she did.
This terrible incident is Miller’s way of showing the reader that forgiveness is typically the best course to take, even if it is not the enjoyable or more appealing alternative. In life, numerous opportunities to do the best thing happen, and the outcome of the dilemma at hand depends on the choices that are made. Forgiveness in the face of an unfavorable incident is often time rather hard to do, but it generally results in more favorable result than vengeance would have resulted in. Vengeance, though quite tempting in its potential customers, has the possibility of rebounding and triggering an uninviting item, often times one that is even worse han what the vengeance was being browsed for in the first place. Through this tragedy, Arthur Miller has the ability to show the audience the advantages in forgiveness. He uses Abigail’s misfortunate choice of action to interact to the viewers that, while the temptation of revenge is typically a great one in the face of pain or offence, it holds the possible to rebound, when forgiveness normally holds no such capacity. Every once in a while, taking the higher road is much better than taking the more satisfactory one.