Hit enter after type your search item

To kill a mockingbird: differences between film and novel

/
/
/
18 Views

To eliminate a mockingbird: distinctions between film and novel

You never ever actually understand a person up until you think about things from his perspective … till you climb into his skin and walk around in it.

Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird

This quote specifies among the most crucial messages in the book, worrying power and prejudice. I believe that this quote might be used to explain lots of circumstances throughout the book.

In my essay I will show examples of the essential events throughout the book that have been omitted or modified from the film “To Eliminate a Mockingbird” and how they add to the deterioration of the crucial messages in the book. When “To Eliminate a Mockingbird” was made into a motion picture, the director modified the storyline to what he believed would be most fascinating to an audience. The outcome of this was, that some scenes were changed, omitted and some were added. The style of the book was slightly altered in the film. The very first notable modifications are the scenes, which are left out.

The scene where Calpurnia takes the children to the black church is the first scene I saw that had been gotten. The children are treated kindly, other than for when Calpurnia is harassed by another worshiper for taking white children to a black church. From this experience the kids learned more about Calpurnia’s background and where she originated from. I think this scene is essential due to the fact that it shows that the quantity of racism is equal from both black and white individuals. Despite the fact that the Finch brother or sister’s daddy is popular in the black neighborhood there is still racial stress from having actually white kids integrated in the black society.

This occasion plays an essential part in the theme of the unique, which is power and prejudice. I think the director needed to take this scene out because there are a lot of events from the book that he needs to fit into the movie, that there wasn’t enough room, or possibly he was on a tight timeline to write the storyline and omitted it. The impact this has on the main style of power and bias is that the audience can not get as much insight as the book provided. Another scene that was gotten of the motion picture, which I thought was extremely essential was the scene where Jem goes to Mrs. Dubose’s house everyday after school for a month to check out to her.

This was a repercussion of Jem reducing all the flowers in her yard. I believe this scene is essential due to the fact that it is a presentation of nerve. Jem realises by going to Mrs. Dubose’s home everyday that there is more to her than her simply being a mean old woman. When she dies he learns that she was in fact a morphine addict and that she dealt with her pain by being terrible to everybody. I believe that the director omitted this scene since it strays too far from the motion picture’s overall style of racism. Another aspect as to why the director might have removed this scene is that it was perhaps too long, or too difficult to arrange.

Appropriate Topics Readers Also Pick

  • Character Traits Of Scout In To Eliminate A Mockingbird

In the long run I think the director eliminated this scene from the motion picture due to the fact that it would not mesmerize the audience, which they would get tired. By omitting this scene the movie doesn’t reveal Jem’s bias versus Mrs. Dubose has actually been conquered. Therefore the effect of eliminating this scene from the movie is the vital message that individuals can overcome their prejudice against somebody if they learn more about them is not effectively shown. The 3rd notable scene in the book was the scene where Jem and Scout went for their first day of school.

In this scene a lot of the characters that play a role in the maturation of Jem and Scout are mentioned. In this scene we satisfy Mrs. Caroline, Scout’s teacher. Scout reveals her that she can check out completely and in response to this Mrs. Caroline snaps, because she believes all the children should understand nothing in this grade. She also believes in keeping a smarter student in a lower grade just so she can teach at the same pace as the rest of the class. The important message displayed in this scene was power. Mrs. Caroline had the power to do the best thing, by teaching Scout to learn more books, but rather she chooses to do the wrong thing.

She scolds Scout since she is different to all the other children. I believe that this played an essential function in the anticipation that even if someone is different it offers you a right to scold them, or treat them severely. In my opinion the director removed this scene since it differs the main theme of the movie. The impact omitting this scene has on the central style of power and bias is that it does not show the power some teacher’s use against wise kids, who reside in impoverished conditions. In the film many characters were taken out completely, or are less involved than portrayed in the book.

The first character I saw that was missing was Auntie Alexandria. In the book Aunt Alexandria check outs Atticus and the children since as she puts it the kids have no motherly influence. Throughout Aunt Alexandria’s check out, she observed that Scout is quite a gamine. She attempts to make Scout act more lady-like. I think the factor she is not in the film was to remove the emphasis on Scout’s maturation. I do not think she is an important character in the book, and I do not believe she includes or eliminates from any critical message in the motion picture.

Another scene that was omitted was outside the court house when Atticus was speaking with Mr. Dolphus Raymond, and understands that he is not consuming alcohol in the brown paper bag; however is consuming soda pop. I believe the director removed this character due to the fact that he thought it might have puzzled the audience. The impact eliminating this character has on the message of power and prejudice is that the audience is not shown that Mr. Dolphus Raymond would choose to be stereotyped as an alcoholic wed to a black female, than discussing his actions to the general public.

This reveals that would rather be prejudiced than discuss his feelings. Another character that was gotten rid of was Uncle Jack. He plays a bit part in the book so I do not think it has affected the crucial message of the book. The last character that is altered is Mayella Ewell. In the book we are implied to sympathize with her, as she is raped and beaten by her father, never kissed a man, and is poor. She accuses Tom Robinson of raping her because of her father’s actions. Nevertheless, through all of this she still plants flowers in her shack to attempt and boost her self-confidence, and give her some hope.

I believe the director translated her differently so that the audience didn’t see the softer, more emotional side of Mayella. I strongly feel that Mayella ought to have been represented in a different way because it alters the perspective, through which you see her. Altering Mayella does not actually have a result of the style power and prejudice, I just believe she is unfairly treated by her portrayal as ruthless. Eventually, I think by excluding specific scenes and modifying characters in the motion picture, it results in defeating the function of the book, which is educating the reader on the critical messages concerning power and bias.

I think that the main oppression in the motion picture was omitting the church scene, the school scene, the court house scene and the alteration of portraying Mayella Ewell as ruthless. There are still numerous resemblances between the book and the movie, nevertheless most movies adapted from a book will struggle to give the audience the exact same insight as the author meant.

Bibliography

1. Smith, T. (2006 ). ‘To Kill A Mockingbird”- Distinctions between Motion Picture and Book: Motion picture Film contrast compare contrast. Free Essays, Term Documents, Term Paper, and Book Report. Recovered April 29, 2011, from http://www. 123helpme. com/view. asp? d=15935

2. Garner, A. (2007, December 10). ‘What do you think are the primary differences in between the motion picture of “To Kill a Mockingbird” and the book?– “To Kill a Mockingbird”– Questions & & Responses’. eNotes– Literature Study Guides, Lesson Plans, and More. Retrieved April 29, 2011, from http://www. enotes. com/to-kill-a-mockingbird/q-and-a/what-do-you-think-difference-between-movie-kill-6539

3. Mulligan, R. (Director). (1962 ). To Kill a Mockingbird [Motion picture] U.S.A.: Universal Studios. Recovered May 8, 2011.

4. Lee, H. (1982 ). To Eliminate a Mockingbird. New York: Warner Books. Retrieved May 8, 2011. By Sheridan Marshall

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar