Hit enter after type your search item

To What Extent Is the Crucible a Play About Tyranny?

/
/
/
106 Views

To What Degree Is the Crucible a Play About Tyranny?Tyranny means oppressive

usage of outright power held by an individual leader to implement obedience by force or dangers. Tyranny is clearly present in The Crucible in different characters, however especially Danforth with his authority in the court and Abigail with the impact she gets over the whole village, in specific the women who take part in the witch trials with her. In Act 3 Danforth tells Giles Corey and Francis Nurse that there are ‘seventy-two condemned to hang by [his] signature’. Danforth has the most influence in the court, as he eventually chooses which sentence each person accused of witchcraft will get. He highlights the severe power he has in response to Corey and Nurse coming to court to protest versus the allegations versus their other halves. It appears that by telling them how much power he has to control individuals’s lives, he is trying to intimidate and subtly threaten the guys not to produce difficulties for him by opposing his decision to have Rebecca Nurse hanged and likely sentence Martha Corey to the exact same fate. It is in his interest to prevent people from going over the possibility of the court being wrong because he is a very well-respected judge and his reputation is under threat if more people start to concur with Corey and Nurse. Danforth’s usage of his position of his authority to safeguard his own interests is a clear example of tyranny in the play. Judge Hathorne and Reverend Parris, although they might not be thought about tyrants themselves, help Danforth to keep his power since they know that it will help to secure their reputations too as they have likewise been associated with the judgement of the people who have currently been detained and sentenced to death. They do this by instantly attempting to discredit the males’s claims that women ‘accusations are false. Hathorne says of Corey and Nurse that ‘they should both be detained in contempt’and when Proctor arrives Parris informs Danforth that’they’ve concerned topple the court’. They both respond by doing this before permitting the men to provide their evidence since as long as they are contradicting the court, they could possibly expose that the court has made

a catastrophic error in believing whatever Abigail and the girls say. Therefore Hathorne and Parris have some part in perpetuating Danforth’s tyranny by declining to let anyone oppose him. Nevertheless, it might be stated that the fault is not with Danforth or the other judges since whilst they do make it difficult for opposing arguments to be heard, they do so just because they have incorrectly relied on the women. Abigail could be referred to as an autocrat due to her power over the other ladies associated with the trials and ultimately her influence over the entire town. In Act Two Elizabeth says that’where she strolls the crowd will part like the sea for

Israel’, which shows that Abigail manages to control everyone around her and ends up being either respected or feared to the point where individuals are afraid to get in her way, perhaps because they know that if they provide her any factor to disagree with them, she can accuse them of witchcraft and more than likely have them hanged. The audience also understands that Abigail has acquired this power mostly by threatening the women who danced in the forest with her previous to the start of the play, if they remember Abigail telling Betty, Grace and Mary in Act One that if they tell anyone about the illicit routines

they performed in the forest she will’bring a pointy reckoning’to them. Here she uses risks to guarantee that they will not expose her, which would cause her credibility being destroyed and her uncle perhaps reaching to disown her. It would likewise rule out any opportunity of her being able to marry John Proctor, who she is still in love with because he ended their affair around 7 months formerly. Therefore there is some evidence that Abigail is the primary perpetrator of tyranny in the play as she threatens the other women and, a little more cunningly, the other people residing in

Salem, in order to carry out her plan to change Elizabeth as John Proctor’s wife and hide the’ witchcraft’she performed in the forest with Tituba. In conclusion, tyranny exists throughout The Crucible, but it is arguable whether Danforth or Abigail is the main reason for this. Danforth is able to utilize his power to make decisions without being opposed in court and uses this to his advantage at times when he realises that his and the other judges ‘track records are at threat if the credibility of Abigail’s claims is questioned.

Abigail could be thought about much more oppressive, however, since she clearly threatens 3 of the other women with death unless they keep her tricks and also holds power over the lives of all the villagers.

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar